Why is the site administrator, a person who theoretically knows the necessary accommodations of every child on this site, negligent to this degree?
Why was the response to her negligence to blame the parents for–entirely reasonably–not being at this child’s side every moment of their being on the site?
Why is the result: “Now we can’t have a literally millennia-old community practice because I, the site administrator, poisoned a child. I am so incapable of creating a space safe for such practices that the only thing I can do is create a rule that prohibits them.”
Why is a person who was so negligent still employed by this district and still in the position to harm others with further negligence?
Why is she trying to have individual meetings with parents rather than a group discussion?
Why did she convene a "committee" which included no parents?
Why is she perverting the concept of "inclusivity" to perform an egregious authoritarian extension of power rather than simply admit she's a human being who made a mistake?
Why is she more interested at figuring out who is asking these questions than she is with answering them?
Why are the parents of the children at this site simply allowing this?